|
Who's Online |
|
We have 23 guests online |
|
Monthly Archive |
-
May, 2012
-
April, 2012
-
March, 2012
-
February, 2012
-
January, 2012
-
December, 2011
-
November, 2011
-
October, 2011
-
September, 2011
-
August, 2011
-
July, 2011
-
June, 2011
-
May, 2011
-
April, 2011
-
March, 2011
-
February, 2011
-
January, 2011
-
December, 2010
-
November, 2010
-
October, 2010
-
September, 2010
-
August, 2010
-
July, 2010
-
June, 2010
-
May, 2010
-
April, 2010
-
March, 2010
-
February, 2010
-
January, 2010
-
December, 2009
-
November, 2009
-
October, 2009
-
September, 2009
-
August, 2009
-
July, 2009
-
June, 2009
-
May, 2009
-
April, 2009
-
March, 2009
-
February, 2009
-
January, 2009
-
December, 2008
-
November, 2008
-
October, 2008
-
September, 2008
-
August, 2008
-
July, 2008
-
June, 2008
-
May, 2008
-
April, 2008
-
March, 2008
-
February, 2008
-
January, 2008
-
December, 2007
-
November, 2007
-
October, 2007
-
September, 2007
-
August, 2007
-
July, 2007
-
June, 2007
-
May, 2007
-
April, 2007
-
March, 2007
-
February, 2007
-
August, 2004
-
July, 2004
-
June, 2004
-
May, 2004
-
April, 2004
|
|
| |
|
Intel Core i3, i5 and i7 ULV Processors Ultra-thin Laptops |
|
|
|
|
Sunday, 30 May 2010 |
|
Intel is definitely putting pressure on AMD, as the microprocessor giant is churning out so many variants of microprocessors into the market. In fact, Intel has disclosed that they will be unleashing their Core i3, i5 and i7 ULV processors, whereby these processors are designed for ultra-thin laptops.
Basically, the new Core i3, i5 and i7 ULV processors are created based on the 32-nanometer Nehalem chips, and Intel claims that the processors can offer 32 percent better performance when compared to Intel’s previous ULV chips. Also, the new ULV chips consume 20 percent less power, which ultimately boost the overall battery life for the laptop. There’s Turbo Boost and Hyper-threading functionalities as well, and the processors have TDPs of 17 watts, which generates less heat as well.
Well I’m over excited over these microprocessors, aren’t you?
Trackback(0)
|
|
| |
|