|
Who's Online |
|
We have 20 guests online |
|
Monthly Archive |
-
May, 2012
-
April, 2012
-
March, 2012
-
February, 2012
-
January, 2012
-
December, 2011
-
November, 2011
-
October, 2011
-
September, 2011
-
August, 2011
-
July, 2011
-
June, 2011
-
May, 2011
-
April, 2011
-
March, 2011
-
February, 2011
-
January, 2011
-
December, 2010
-
November, 2010
-
October, 2010
-
September, 2010
-
August, 2010
-
July, 2010
-
June, 2010
-
May, 2010
-
April, 2010
-
March, 2010
-
February, 2010
-
January, 2010
-
December, 2009
-
November, 2009
-
October, 2009
-
September, 2009
-
August, 2009
-
July, 2009
-
June, 2009
-
May, 2009
-
April, 2009
-
March, 2009
-
February, 2009
-
January, 2009
-
December, 2008
-
November, 2008
-
October, 2008
-
September, 2008
-
August, 2008
-
July, 2008
-
June, 2008
-
May, 2008
-
April, 2008
-
March, 2008
-
February, 2008
-
January, 2008
-
December, 2007
-
November, 2007
-
October, 2007
-
September, 2007
-
August, 2007
-
July, 2007
-
June, 2007
-
May, 2007
-
April, 2007
-
March, 2007
-
February, 2007
-
August, 2004
-
July, 2004
-
June, 2004
-
May, 2004
-
April, 2004
|
|
| |
|
Wednesday, 15 September 2010 |
Olympus makes mighty-fine DSLRs, whereby I usually attribute these cameras as an ultra high-end camera. Nevertheless, it seems that Olympus yet again unleashed another technological wonder, dubbed as the E-5 DSLR.
Basically, the E-5 DSLR is encased in splash and dust-proof magnesium alloy body. Also, the E-5 is equipped with the TruePic V+ image processor and has an ISO range from 100 to 6400. Also, the E-5 can snap 720p videos, as well as 12.3 megapixel stills. Also, I find the 3-inch dual-axis swiveling LCD unit to be indispensable as it allows you to view better through the viewfinder.
Do take note that Olympus has decided to price their E-5 DSLR rather exorbitantly, whereby you’ll need to pay a premium price of $1,699.99 for the body alone. Take a closer look at the Olympus E-5 DSLR:
Trackback(0)
 |
|
| |
|
![[Valid RSS]](http://mac.andpc.com/images/rssgrey.jpg "Mac.andPC RSS feed")
TrackBack URI for this entry
Subscribe to this comment's feed